Zaisei Zukan 日本語

Current balance ratio ranking

Villages · lowest first · FY2024 (183)

Recurring costs that must be paid every year (personnel, social assistance, debt service) as a share of recurring general revenue. The higher it is, the less room for new spending; above 90% is considered rigid.

All municipalitiesCitiesTokyo wardsTownsVillagesPrefectures
Fiscal strengthCurrent balanceDebt serviceFuture burdenDebt per residentReserves per residentNet debtAdjustment fundOwn-source revenueTaxes per residentSpending per residentMandatory spendingInvestmentWelfare per residentChild welfareEducation per residentHometown taxStaff per 1,000PopulationPopulation change
#MunicipalityPrefecturePopulationCurrent balance
151 Hinoemata Village Fukushima 484 92.9%
152 Uken Village Kagoshima 1,604 92.9%
153 Mihara Village Kochi 1,355 93.5%
154 Tonaki Village Okinawa 291 93.5%
155 Rokkasho Village Aomori 9,628 93.6%
156 Kitagawa Village Kochi 1,177 93.7%
157 Kawakami Village Nara 1,188 93.8%
158 Toyone Village Aichi 929 94.2%
159 Ohira Village Miyagi 5,539 94.3%
160 Sarufutsu Village Hokkaido 2,589 94.4%
161 Kazamaura Village Aomori 1,554 94.4%
162 Kurotaki Village Nara 589 94.7%
163 Izena Village Okinawa 1,237 94.8%
164 Shinjiyo Village Okayama 793 95.0%
165 Aguni Village Okinawa 676 95.0%
166 Kamikitayama Village Nara 421 95.2%
167 Yamae Village Kumamoto 3,162 95.2%
168 Tamakawa Village Fukushima 6,050 95.4%
169 Tabayama Village Yamanashi 501 95.4%
170 Minamiaso Village Kumamoto 10,026 95.9%
171 Yugawa Village Fukushima 2,980 96.3%
172 Akaigawa Village Hokkaido 1,492 96.7%
173 Shinto Village Gunma 14,634 96.7%
174 Chibu Village Shimane 574 97.0%
175 Minamiyamashiro Village Kyoto 2,379 97.2%
176 Higashishirakawa Village Gifu 2,011 97.7%
177 Awashimaura Village Niigata 312 97.8%
178 Showa Village Fukushima 1,085 98.4%
179 Nishiawakura Village Okayama 1,331 98.4%
180 Fudai Village Iwate 2,293 98.5%
181 Asuka Village Nara 5,049 98.7%
182 Okawa Village Kochi 355 99.3%
183 Tokai Village Ibaraki 38,151 99.9%

Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications settlement data. Municipalities without a value (such as the fiscal strength index of Tokyo's special wards) are excluded.