Current balance ratio ranking
Villages · lowest first · FY2024 (183)
Recurring costs that must be paid every year (personnel, social assistance, debt service) as a share of recurring general revenue. The higher it is, the less room for new spending; above 90% is considered rigid.
Fiscal strengthCurrent balanceDebt serviceFuture burdenDebt per residentReserves per residentNet debtAdjustment fundOwn-source revenueTaxes per residentSpending per residentMandatory spendingInvestmentWelfare per residentChild welfareEducation per residentHometown taxStaff per 1,000PopulationPopulation change
| # | Municipality | Prefecture | Population | Current balance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tomari Village | Hokkaido | 1,420 | 52.8% | |
| 2 | Kariwa Village | Niigata | 4,222 | 70.5% | |
| 3 | Shimojo Village | Nagano | 3,421 | 70.7% | |
| 4 | Sarabetsu Village | Hokkaido | 3,084 | 71.5% | |
| 5 | Higashidori Village | Aomori | 5,553 | 72.1% | |
| 6 | Hinohara Village | Tokyo | 1,923 | 72.9% | |
| 7 | Oshika Village | Nagano | 868 | 73.1% | |
| 8 | Yasuoka Village | Nagano | 1,426 | 73.4% | |
| 9 | Nishigo Village | Fukushima | 20,616 | 74.0% | |
| 10 | Miyada Village | Nagano | 8,743 | 74.0% | |
| 11 | Tobishima Village | Aichi | 4,713 | 74.1% | |
| 12 | Ie Village | Okinawa | 4,268 | 74.3% | |
| 13 | Narusawa Village | Yamanashi | 3,058 | 74.8% | |
| 14 | Iitate Village | Fukushima | 4,506 | 75.2% | |
| 15 | Ogasawara Village | Tokyo | 2,496 | 75.2% | |
| 16 | Yamazoe Village | Nara | 3,055 | 76.1% | |
| 17 | Yamagata Village | Nagano | 8,486 | 76.2% | |
| 18 | Toyoka Village | Nagano | 6,501 | 76.8% | |
| 19 | Aoki Village | Nagano | 4,086 | 76.9% | |
| 20 | Neba Village | Nagano | 806 | 77.1% | |
| 21 | Asahi Village | Nagano | 4,263 | 77.3% | |
| 22 | Hakuba Village | Nagano | 9,525 | 77.3% | |
| 23 | Kozushima Village | Tokyo | 1,737 | 77.5% | |
| 24 | Minamimaki Village | Nagano | 2,977 | 77.6% | |
| 25 | Shirakawa Village | Gifu | 1,470 | 77.9% | |
| 26 | Sakae Village | Nagano | 1,560 | 78.3% | |
| 27 | Onna Village | Okinawa | 11,316 | 78.8% | |
| 28 | Ueno Village | Gunma | 1,011 | 79.0% | |
| 29 | Hiraya Village | Nagano | 377 | 79.1% | |
| 30 | Kawakami Village | Nagano | 3,631 | 79.3% | |
| 31 | Tozawa Village | Yamagata | 3,850 | 79.5% | |
| 32 | Omi Village | Nagano | 2,412 | 79.5% | |
| 33 | Chikuhoku Village | Nagano | 3,976 | 79.5% | |
| 34 | Kitayama Village | Wakayama | 382 | 79.6% | |
| 35 | Mitsue Village | Nara | 1,347 | 79.7% | |
| 36 | Yahiko Village | Niigata | 7,534 | 80.1% | |
| 37 | Tenryu Village | Nagano | 1,028 | 80.1% | |
| 38 | Ikusaka Village | Nagano | 1,615 | 80.2% | |
| 39 | Kitadaito Village | Okinawa | 544 | 80.6% | |
| 40 | Hiezu Village | Tottori | 3,616 | 81.1% | |
| 41 | Takagi Village | Nagano | 5,888 | 81.4% | |
| 42 | Morotsuka Village | Miyazaki | 1,406 | 81.7% | |
| 43 | Tenei Village | Fukushima | 5,171 | 81.9% | |
| 44 | Matsukawa Village | Nagano | 9,648 | 81.9% | |
| 45 | Kuma Village | Kumamoto | 2,648 | 81.9% | |
| 46 | Minamiaiki Village | Nagano | 926 | 82.0% | |
| 47 | Shiiba Village | Miyazaki | 2,406 | 82.1% | |
| 48 | Nakijin Village | Okinawa | 9,183 | 82.1% | |
| 49 | Shosanbetsu Village | Hokkaido | 1,005 | 82.2% | |
| 50 | Rusutsu Village | Hokkaido | 2,018 | 82.3% |
Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications settlement data. Municipalities without a value (such as the fiscal strength index of Tokyo's special wards) are excluded.