Fiscal adjustment fund ratio ranking
Cities · highest first · FY2024 (792)
The freely usable reserve (fiscal adjustment fund) as a percentage of standard annual revenue. Around 10–20% is considered comfortable.
Fiscal strengthCurrent balanceDebt serviceFuture burdenDebt per residentReserves per residentNet debtAdjustment fundOwn-source revenueTaxes per residentSpending per residentMandatory spendingInvestmentWelfare per residentChild welfareEducation per residentHometown taxStaff per 1,000PopulationPopulation change
| # | Municipality | Prefecture | Population | Adjustment fund | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | Tatsuno City | Hyogo | 72,271 | 41.3% | |
| 52 | Komoro City | Nagano | 41,248 | 40.9% | |
| 53 | Bungotakada City | Oita | 21,748 | 40.6% | |
| 54 | Asago City | Hyogo | 27,754 | 40.3% | |
| 55 | Suzu City | Ishikawa | 11,374 | 40.3% | |
| 56 | Settsu City | Osaka | 86,344 | 39.9% | |
| 57 | Kami City | Kochi | 24,667 | 39.9% | |
| 58 | Nagato City | Yamaguchi | 30,207 | 39.8% | |
| 59 | Annaka City | Gunma | 53,790 | 39.7% | |
| 60 | Atami City | Shizuoka | 33,290 | 39.3% | |
| 61 | Kamiamakusa City | Kumamoto | 23,592 | 39.1% | |
| 62 | Miyawaka City | Fukuoka | 26,092 | 39.0% | |
| 63 | Ono City | Hyogo | 46,825 | 39.0% | |
| 64 | Amakusa City | Kumamoto | 71,920 | 38.1% | |
| 65 | Yawatahama City | Ehime | 30,019 | 38.1% | |
| 66 | Niimi City | Okayama | 25,939 | 38.0% | |
| 67 | Miyoshi City | Aichi | 61,408 | 37.9% | |
| 68 | Omaezaki City | Shizuoka | 29,715 | 37.4% | |
| 69 | Uenohara City | Yamanashi | 21,208 | 37.1% | |
| 70 | Kamaishi City | Iwate | 28,934 | 37.1% | |
| 71 | Bungoono City | Oita | 31,998 | 36.6% | |
| 72 | Akishima City | Tokyo | 115,632 | 36.5% | |
| 73 | Makurazaki City | Kagoshima | 18,898 | 36.4% | |
| 74 | Imabari City | Ehime | 147,702 | 36.4% | |
| 75 | Taketa City | Oita | 18,917 | 36.2% | |
| 76 | Moriya City | Ibaraki | 70,900 | 36.0% | |
| 77 | Gero City | Gifu | 28,915 | 35.9% | |
| 78 | Isumi City | Chiba | 34,705 | 35.8% | |
| 79 | Okawa City | Fukuoka | 31,147 | 35.8% | |
| 80 | Miyama City | Fukuoka | 34,291 | 35.6% | |
| 81 | Sanjo City | Niigata | 91,178 | 35.4% | |
| 82 | Naruto City | Tokushima | 53,240 | 35.4% | |
| 83 | Ogori City | Fukuoka | 59,509 | 35.3% | |
| 84 | Mino City | Gifu | 18,991 | 35.1% | |
| 85 | Matsura City | Nagasaki | 20,439 | 35.0% | |
| 86 | Uto City | Kumamoto | 36,143 | 35.0% | |
| 87 | Kakamigahara City | Gifu | 144,195 | 34.9% | |
| 88 | Urayasu City | Chiba | 171,322 | 34.7% | |
| 89 | Iwanuma City | Miyagi | 43,137 | 34.5% | |
| 90 | Sanuki City | Kagawa | 44,348 | 34.5% | |
| 91 | Kasai City | Hyogo | 41,455 | 34.5% | |
| 92 | Inabe City | Mie | 44,507 | 34.5% | |
| 93 | Kinokawa City | Wakayama | 58,920 | 34.2% | |
| 94 | Nasukarasuyama City | Tochigi | 23,482 | 34.2% | |
| 95 | Mizunami City | Gifu | 35,279 | 34.1% | |
| 96 | Minokamo City | Gifu | 57,595 | 34.0% | |
| 97 | Yamagata City | Gifu | 24,767 | 33.7% | |
| 98 | Susono City | Shizuoka | 48,688 | 33.5% | |
| 99 | Sakuragawa City | Ibaraki | 37,635 | 33.5% | |
| 100 | Nogata City | Fukuoka | 54,838 | 33.4% |
Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications settlement data. Municipalities without a value (such as the fiscal strength index of Tokyo's special wards) are excluded.