Fiscal adjustment fund ratio ranking
Cities · highest first · FY2024 (792)
The freely usable reserve (fiscal adjustment fund) as a percentage of standard annual revenue. Around 10–20% is considered comfortable.
Fiscal strengthCurrent balanceDebt serviceFuture burdenDebt per residentReserves per residentNet debtAdjustment fundOwn-source revenueTaxes per residentSpending per residentMandatory spendingInvestmentWelfare per residentChild welfareEducation per residentHometown taxStaff per 1,000PopulationPopulation change
| # | Municipality | Prefecture | Population | Adjustment fund | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rikuzentakata City | Iwate | 17,226 | 87.7% | |
| 2 | Yubari City | Hokkaido | 6,107 | 80.3% | |
| 3 | Ukiha City | Fukuoka | 27,382 | 73.5% | |
| 4 | Takayama City | Gifu | 82,486 | 73.0% | |
| 5 | Kumano City | Mie | 14,981 | 68.0% | |
| 6 | Miyoshi City | Tokushima | 22,225 | 67.8% | |
| 7 | Seki City | Gifu | 83,930 | 65.9% | |
| 8 | Higashikagawa City | Kagawa | 27,353 | 65.3% | |
| 9 | Midori City | Gunma | 48,470 | 63.6% | |
| 10 | Nakama City | Fukuoka | 39,014 | 62.8% | |
| 11 | Uki City | Kumamoto | 56,356 | 56.3% | |
| 12 | Isa City | Kagoshima | 22,748 | 56.2% | |
| 13 | Asakuchi City | Okayama | 32,525 | 56.2% | |
| 14 | Kitaakita City | Akita | 27,834 | 54.2% | |
| 15 | Etajima City | Hiroshima | 20,690 | 54.1% | |
| 16 | Muroto City | Kochi | 11,273 | 53.6% | |
| 17 | Ibara City | Okayama | 36,670 | 53.6% | |
| 18 | Ashiya City | Hyogo | 94,007 | 53.1% | |
| 19 | Bizen City | Okayama | 30,816 | 52.6% | |
| 20 | Kahoku City | Ishikawa | 36,200 | 52.4% | |
| 21 | Soma City | Fukushima | 32,261 | 52.0% | |
| 22 | Mimasaka City | Okayama | 24,886 | 51.7% | |
| 23 | Tendo City | Yamagata | 60,204 | 51.6% | |
| 24 | Tamano City | Okayama | 54,130 | 51.1% | |
| 25 | Fukaya City | Saitama | 140,809 | 51.0% | |
| 26 | Ureshino City | Saga | 24,446 | 48.6% | |
| 27 | Ojiya City | Niigata | 32,602 | 48.5% | |
| 28 | Kani City | Gifu | 99,779 | 48.0% | |
| 29 | Gobo City | Wakayama | 21,074 | 47.9% | |
| 30 | Izumi City | Kagoshima | 51,405 | 47.6% | |
| 31 | Itoshima City | Fukuoka | 104,175 | 47.6% | |
| 32 | Hitachiota City | Ibaraki | 46,390 | 47.4% | |
| 33 | Kikuchi City | Kumamoto | 46,599 | 47.3% | |
| 34 | Wajima City | Ishikawa | 20,928 | 46.9% | |
| 35 | Yukuhashi City | Fukuoka | 72,254 | 46.0% | |
| 36 | Izu City | Shizuoka | 27,748 | 45.3% | |
| 37 | Tomiya City | Miyagi | 52,452 | 45.3% | |
| 38 | Nishiwaki City | Hyogo | 37,688 | 44.1% | |
| 39 | Yame City | Fukuoka | 59,544 | 44.0% | |
| 40 | Kato City | Hyogo | 39,413 | 43.3% | |
| 41 | Ebino City | Miyazaki | 17,067 | 43.2% | |
| 42 | Asahi City | Chiba | 61,986 | 42.9% | |
| 43 | Sojiya City | Okayama | 69,625 | 42.8% | |
| 44 | Miyakojima City | Okinawa | 55,656 | 42.6% | |
| 45 | Akaiwa City | Okayama | 42,490 | 42.3% | |
| 46 | Awara City | Fukui | 26,306 | 42.3% | |
| 47 | Maniwa City | Okayama | 40,778 | 42.3% | |
| 48 | Owase City | Mie | 15,524 | 41.5% | |
| 49 | Kesennuma City | Miyagi | 56,300 | 41.5% | |
| 50 | Myoko City | Niigata | 29,514 | 41.5% |
Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications settlement data. Municipalities without a value (such as the fiscal strength index of Tokyo's special wards) are excluded.