Mandatory spending ratio ranking
Cities · lowest first · FY2024 (792)
Personnel costs, social assistance and debt service — spending that is hard to cut — as a share of total spending.
Fiscal strengthCurrent balanceDebt serviceFuture burdenDebt per residentReserves per residentNet debtAdjustment fundOwn-source revenueTaxes per residentSpending per residentMandatory spendingInvestmentWelfare per residentChild welfareEducation per residentHometown taxStaff per 1,000PopulationPopulation change
| # | Municipality | Prefecture | Population | Mandatory spending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 151 | Koriyama City | Fukushima | 312,433 | 41.0% | |
| 152 | Marugame City | Kagawa | 110,803 | 41.1% | |
| 153 | Setochi City | Okayama | 36,160 | 41.1% | |
| 154 | Otake City | Hiroshima | 25,353 | 41.1% | |
| 155 | Towada City | Aomori | 57,361 | 41.1% | |
| 156 | Ofunato City | Iwate | 32,059 | 41.2% | |
| 157 | Tsushima City | Nagasaki | 27,102 | 41.2% | |
| 158 | Kani City | Gifu | 99,779 | 41.2% | |
| 159 | Kokubunji City | Tokyo | 129,500 | 41.2% | |
| 160 | Yonezawa City | Yamagata | 74,629 | 41.2% | |
| 161 | Hofu City | Yamaguchi | 113,144 | 41.2% | |
| 162 | Kurobe City | Toyama | 39,155 | 41.3% | |
| 163 | Makurazaki City | Kagoshima | 18,898 | 41.3% | |
| 164 | Kato City | Hyogo | 39,413 | 41.3% | |
| 165 | Sakura City | Tochigi | 43,760 | 41.3% | |
| 166 | Kamo City | Niigata | 24,079 | 41.4% | |
| 167 | Yabu City | Hyogo | 21,005 | 41.4% | |
| 168 | Maniwa City | Okayama | 40,778 | 41.5% | |
| 169 | Fuchu City | Tokyo | 260,998 | 41.5% | |
| 170 | Ishinomaki City | Miyagi | 132,447 | 41.5% | |
| 171 | Suzaka City | Nagano | 49,149 | 41.5% | |
| 172 | Sakuragawa City | Ibaraki | 37,635 | 41.5% | |
| 173 | Hitachiota City | Ibaraki | 46,390 | 41.5% | |
| 174 | Tsuru City | Yamanashi | 28,509 | 41.5% | |
| 175 | Awara City | Fukui | 26,306 | 41.5% | |
| 176 | Seiyo City | Ehime | 33,721 | 41.5% | |
| 177 | Aso City | Kumamoto | 24,170 | 41.7% | |
| 178 | Miyoshi City | Hiroshima | 47,904 | 41.7% | |
| 179 | Urayasu City | Chiba | 171,322 | 41.7% | |
| 180 | Kunisaki City | Oita | 25,074 | 41.7% | |
| 181 | Kuroishi City | Aomori | 30,428 | 41.7% | |
| 182 | Tomiya City | Miyagi | 52,452 | 41.8% | |
| 183 | Atami City | Shizuoka | 33,290 | 41.8% | |
| 184 | Shibetsu City | Hokkaido | 16,440 | 41.8% | |
| 185 | Kitakami City | Iwate | 91,090 | 41.8% | |
| 186 | Kariya City | Aichi | 152,984 | 41.9% | |
| 187 | Soma City | Fukushima | 32,261 | 41.9% | |
| 188 | Sakata City | Yamagata | 93,924 | 41.9% | |
| 189 | Odate City | Akita | 65,492 | 42.0% | |
| 190 | Nishiwaki City | Hyogo | 37,688 | 42.0% | |
| 191 | Hekinan City | Aichi | 72,242 | 42.0% | |
| 192 | Ibara City | Okayama | 36,670 | 42.0% | |
| 193 | Kaminoyama City | Yamagata | 27,584 | 42.1% | |
| 194 | Uwajima City | Ehime | 66,981 | 42.1% | |
| 195 | Susono City | Shizuoka | 48,688 | 42.1% | |
| 196 | Fuchu City | Hiroshima | 35,105 | 42.2% | |
| 197 | Unnan City | Shimane | 34,426 | 42.2% | |
| 198 | Fujinomiya City | Shizuoka | 126,857 | 42.2% | |
| 199 | Miyako City | Iwate | 45,632 | 42.3% | |
| 200 | Sakai City | Fukui | 88,430 | 42.3% |
Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications settlement data. Municipalities without a value (such as the fiscal strength index of Tokyo's special wards) are excluded.