Mandatory spending ratio ranking

Cities · lowest first · FY2024 (792)

Personnel costs, social assistance and debt service — spending that is hard to cut — as a share of total spending.

#MunicipalityPrefecturePopulationMandatory spending
51 Uozu City Toyama 38,617 36.6%
52 Nakano City Nagano 42,162 36.6%
53 Toyota City Aichi 414,750 36.6%
54 Akabira City Hokkaido 8,464 36.7%
55 Moriya City Ibaraki 70,900 36.7%
56 Abashiri City Hokkaido 32,199 36.8%
57 Nirasaki City Yamanashi 27,798 36.8%
58 Hokuto City Yamanashi 45,380 36.8%
59 Tsubame City Niigata 75,935 36.8%
60 Nishinomote City Kagoshima 14,095 36.9%
61 Himi City Toyama 42,167 36.9%
62 Daisen City Akita 73,794 37.1%
63 Taku City Saga 17,604 37.1%
64 Ojiya City Niigata 32,602 37.2%
65 Sagae City Yamagata 39,417 37.3%
66 Katsuyama City Fukui 21,056 37.4%
67 Awaji City Hyogo 41,364 37.4%
68 Aki City Kochi 15,555 37.4%
69 Isumi City Chiba 34,705 37.5%
70 Oga City Akita 23,355 37.5%
71 Kushima City Miyazaki 16,047 37.7%
72 Ureshino City Saga 24,446 37.7%
73 Yuzawa City Akita 39,484 37.7%
74 Niimi City Okayama 25,939 37.8%
75 Minamikyushu City Kagoshima 31,457 37.8%
76 Yaizu City Shizuoka 135,294 37.9%
77 Yawatahama City Ehime 30,019 38.0%
78 Musashino City Tokyo 148,034 38.0%
79 Takahashi City Okayama 26,020 38.0%
80 Moka City Tochigi 78,284 38.1%
81 Imari City Saga 51,664 38.1%
82 Tahara City Aichi 58,270 38.1%
83 Inashiki City Ibaraki 37,012 38.2%
84 Koshu City Yamanashi 29,079 38.2%
85 Ena City Gifu 46,054 38.2%
86 Sukumo City Kochi 18,394 38.3%
87 Gujo City Gifu 37,728 38.3%
88 Miyakonojo City Miyazaki 162,574 38.4%
89 Nanto City Toyama 46,071 38.4%
90 Motosu City Gifu 32,885 38.4%
91 Mutsu City Aomori 51,606 38.4%
92 Bibai City Hokkaido 18,427 38.4%
93 Asakura City Fukuoka 50,024 38.5%
94 Sado City Niigata 48,103 38.6%
95 Kamiamakusa City Kumamoto 23,592 38.6%
96 Takehara City Hiroshima 22,557 38.7%
97 Tokamachi City Niigata 47,124 38.7%
98 Oyabe City Toyama 27,857 38.8%
99 Gamagori City Aichi 77,535 38.8%
100 Mimasaka City Okayama 24,886 38.9%

Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications settlement data. Municipalities without a value (such as the fiscal strength index of Tokyo's special wards) are excluded.