Fiscal adjustment fund ratio ranking
Cities · highest first · FY2024 (792)
The freely usable reserve (fiscal adjustment fund) as a percentage of standard annual revenue. Around 10–20% is considered comfortable.
Fiscal strengthCurrent balanceDebt serviceFuture burdenDebt per residentReserves per residentNet debtAdjustment fundOwn-source revenueTaxes per residentSpending per residentMandatory spendingInvestmentWelfare per residentChild welfareEducation per residentHometown taxStaff per 1,000PopulationPopulation change
| # | Municipality | Prefecture | Population | Adjustment fund | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 151 | Yanagawa City | Fukuoka | 61,536 | 29.6% | |
| 152 | Sakaiminato City | Tottori | 32,469 | 29.6% | |
| 153 | Itami City | Hyogo | 200,284 | 29.6% | |
| 154 | Hamada City | Shimane | 48,576 | 29.3% | |
| 155 | Hagi City | Yamaguchi | 41,637 | 29.2% | |
| 156 | Takehara City | Hiroshima | 22,557 | 29.1% | |
| 157 | Utashinai City | Hokkaido | 2,584 | 29.0% | |
| 158 | Taku City | Saga | 17,604 | 29.0% | |
| 159 | Motosu City | Gifu | 32,885 | 28.9% | |
| 160 | Hokota City | Ibaraki | 46,537 | 28.9% | |
| 161 | Kizugawa City | Kyoto | 79,339 | 28.9% | |
| 162 | Shiojiri City | Nagano | 65,205 | 28.8% | |
| 163 | Towada City | Aomori | 57,361 | 28.7% | |
| 164 | Yokote City | Akita | 80,777 | 28.3% | |
| 165 | Kitsuki City | Oita | 26,153 | 28.3% | |
| 166 | Tsushima City | Aichi | 59,566 | 28.3% | |
| 167 | Neyagawa City | Osaka | 224,378 | 28.2% | |
| 168 | Arida City | Wakayama | 25,230 | 28.1% | |
| 169 | Suzaka City | Nagano | 49,149 | 28.0% | |
| 170 | Saikai City | Nagasaki | 24,973 | 28.0% | |
| 171 | Zushi City | Kanagawa | 57,827 | 27.9% | |
| 172 | Takashima City | Shiga | 45,190 | 27.9% | |
| 173 | Yanai City | Yamaguchi | 29,233 | 27.9% | |
| 174 | Katano City | Osaka | 77,191 | 27.8% | |
| 175 | Sumoto City | Hyogo | 40,767 | 27.7% | |
| 176 | Minamikyushu City | Kagoshima | 31,457 | 27.7% | |
| 177 | Konan City | Kochi | 32,585 | 27.6% | |
| 178 | Omihachiman City | Shiga | 81,942 | 27.6% | |
| 179 | Ton City | Ehime | 32,959 | 27.6% | |
| 180 | Miyako City | Iwate | 45,632 | 27.6% | |
| 181 | Yuzawa City | Akita | 39,484 | 27.5% | |
| 182 | Kai City | Yamanashi | 76,370 | 27.3% | |
| 183 | Rumoi City | Hokkaido | 18,169 | 27.3% | |
| 184 | Takasago City | Hyogo | 86,511 | 27.3% | |
| 185 | Shiroishi City | Miyagi | 30,569 | 27.2% | |
| 186 | Joso City | Ibaraki | 60,596 | 27.1% | |
| 187 | Satsumasendai City | Kagoshima | 90,536 | 26.9% | |
| 188 | Katsuyama City | Fukui | 21,056 | 26.9% | |
| 189 | Yoshinogawa City | Tokushima | 37,558 | 26.8% | |
| 190 | Izunokuni City | Shizuoka | 45,983 | 26.8% | |
| 191 | Hitachi City | Ibaraki | 163,855 | 26.8% | |
| 192 | Sakaide City | Kagawa | 49,575 | 26.6% | |
| 193 | Amami City | Kagoshima | 40,239 | 26.5% | |
| 194 | Tamura City | Fukushima | 32,982 | 26.3% | |
| 195 | Aisai City | Aichi | 60,457 | 26.2% | |
| 196 | Tsuru City | Yamanashi | 28,509 | 26.2% | |
| 197 | Osakasayama City | Osaka | 57,746 | 25.9% | |
| 198 | Shikokuchuo City | Ehime | 80,965 | 25.9% | |
| 199 | Ina City | Nagano | 64,901 | 25.9% | |
| 200 | Tachikawa City | Tokyo | 186,257 | 25.9% |
Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications settlement data. Municipalities without a value (such as the fiscal strength index of Tokyo's special wards) are excluded.