Mandatory spending ratio ranking

Villages · lowest first · FY2024 (183)

Personnel costs, social assistance and debt service — spending that is hard to cut — as a share of total spending.

#MunicipalityPrefecturePopulationMandatory spending
151 Hinoemata Village Fukushima 484 38.8%
152 Kijimadaira Village Nagano 4,237 38.8%
153 Tanohata Village Iwate 2,888 38.8%
154 Tozawa Village Yamagata 3,850 39.2%
155 Kunohe Village Iwate 5,084 39.3%
156 Hara Village Nagano 8,090 39.4%
157 Higashi Village Okinawa 1,701 39.4%
158 Yamagata Village Nagano 8,486 39.6%
159 Higashiyoshino Village Nara 1,498 39.8%
160 Tokashiki Village Okinawa 665 39.9%
161 Shingo Village Aomori 2,059 40.1%
162 Soni Village Nara 1,270 40.2%
163 Chosei Village Chiba 13,269 40.4%
164 Shimamaki Village Hokkaido 1,246 40.8%
165 Kitashiobara Village Fukushima 2,394 40.9%
166 Matsukawa Village Nagano 9,648 41.0%
167 Nishihara Village Kumamoto 7,074 41.3%
168 Izumizaki Village Fukushima 6,092 41.6%
169 Funahashi Village Toyama 3,313 41.9%
170 Yugawa Village Fukushima 2,980 41.9%
171 Otama Village Fukushima 8,817 42.0%
172 Okuwa Village Nagano 3,206 42.3%
173 Asuka Village Nara 5,049 43.6%
174 Minamiaso Village Kumamoto 10,026 43.6%
175 Tenkawa Village Nara 1,194 44.2%
176 Otoineppu Village Hokkaido 601 44.4%
177 Yomitan Village Okinawa 42,289 44.7%
178 Minamiminowa Village Nagano 16,051 44.8%
179 Chihayaakasaka Village Osaka 4,687 46.1%
180 Hirata Village Fukushima 5,352 46.5%
181 Hiezu Village Tottori 3,616 49.2%
182 Kitanakagusuku Village Okinawa 17,951 49.2%
183 Nakagusuku Village Okinawa 22,683 55.1%

Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications settlement data. Municipalities without a value (such as the fiscal strength index of Tokyo's special wards) are excluded.