Mandatory spending ratio ranking
Villages · lowest first · FY2024 (183)
Personnel costs, social assistance and debt service — spending that is hard to cut — as a share of total spending.
Fiscal strengthCurrent balanceDebt serviceFuture burdenDebt per residentReserves per residentNet debtAdjustment fundOwn-source revenueTaxes per residentSpending per residentMandatory spendingInvestmentWelfare per residentChild welfareEducation per residentHometown taxStaff per 1,000PopulationPopulation change
| # | Municipality | Prefecture | Population | Mandatory spending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | Otaki Village | Nagano | 640 | 32.8% | |
| 102 | Miho Village | Ibaraki | 14,156 | 33.1% | |
| 103 | Katashina Village | Gunma | 3,928 | 33.2% | |
| 104 | Samegawa Village | Fukushima | 2,846 | 33.4% | |
| 105 | Achi Village | Nagano | 5,941 | 33.4% | |
| 106 | Chikuhoku Village | Nagano | 3,976 | 33.6% | |
| 107 | Aoki Village | Nagano | 4,086 | 33.6% | |
| 108 | Nakajima Village | Fukushima | 4,732 | 33.7% | |
| 109 | Asahi Village | Nagano | 4,263 | 33.7% | |
| 110 | Shimukappu Village | Hokkaido | 1,590 | 33.8% | |
| 111 | Doshi Village | Yamanashi | 1,509 | 34.1% | |
| 112 | Kawaba Village | Gunma | 2,973 | 34.1% | |
| 113 | Kiyokawa Village | Kanagawa | 2,716 | 34.2% | |
| 114 | Minamidaito Village | Okinawa | 1,227 | 34.3% | |
| 115 | Nakagawa Village | Nagano | 4,620 | 34.3% | |
| 116 | Yasuoka Village | Nagano | 1,426 | 34.3% | |
| 117 | Kamikitayama Village | Nara | 421 | 34.6% | |
| 118 | Kamikoani Village | Akita | 1,869 | 34.7% | |
| 119 | Okura Village | Yamagata | 2,760 | 34.7% | |
| 120 | Kurotaki Village | Nara | 589 | 34.9% | |
| 121 | Yahiko Village | Niigata | 7,534 | 34.9% | |
| 122 | Minamiaiki Village | Nagano | 926 | 35.3% | |
| 123 | Tenryu Village | Nagano | 1,028 | 35.4% | |
| 124 | Himeshima Village | Oita | 1,711 | 35.5% | |
| 125 | Nosegawa Village | Nara | 322 | 35.7% | |
| 126 | Mitsue Village | Nara | 1,347 | 35.8% | |
| 127 | Makkari Village | Hokkaido | 1,938 | 35.8% | |
| 128 | Miyada Village | Nagano | 8,743 | 35.9% | |
| 129 | Ogimi Village | Okinawa | 2,910 | 36.0% | |
| 130 | Mishima Village | Kagoshima | 344 | 36.0% | |
| 131 | Chibu Village | Shimane | 574 | 36.3% | |
| 132 | Sanagochi Village | Tokushima | 2,106 | 36.4% | |
| 133 | Rusutsu Village | Hokkaido | 2,018 | 36.4% | |
| 134 | Higashishirakawa Village | Gifu | 2,011 | 36.4% | |
| 135 | Yamazoe Village | Nara | 3,055 | 36.5% | |
| 136 | Takagi Village | Nagano | 5,888 | 36.6% | |
| 137 | Takayama Village | Nagano | 6,413 | 36.8% | |
| 138 | Takayama Village | Gunma | 3,260 | 36.9% | |
| 139 | Higashichichibu Village | Saitama | 2,406 | 37.0% | |
| 140 | Kitaaiki Village | Nagano | 647 | 37.1% | |
| 141 | Mihara Village | Kochi | 1,355 | 37.3% | |
| 142 | Inakadate Village | Aomori | 7,239 | 37.3% | |
| 143 | Kawakami Village | Nagano | 3,631 | 37.5% | |
| 144 | Kunigami Village | Okinawa | 4,459 | 37.6% | |
| 145 | Nishiokoppe Village | Hokkaido | 956 | 38.0% | |
| 146 | Nishigo Village | Fukushima | 20,616 | 38.0% | |
| 147 | Ohira Village | Miyagi | 5,539 | 38.2% | |
| 148 | Kiso Village | Nagano | 2,516 | 38.2% | |
| 149 | Tokai Village | Ibaraki | 38,151 | 38.3% | |
| 150 | Tamakawa Village | Fukushima | 6,050 | 38.4% |
Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications settlement data. Municipalities without a value (such as the fiscal strength index of Tokyo's special wards) are excluded.