Current balance ratio ranking
Villages · lowest first · FY2024 (183)
Recurring costs that must be paid every year (personnel, social assistance, debt service) as a share of recurring general revenue. The higher it is, the less room for new spending; above 90% is considered rigid.
Fiscal strengthCurrent balanceDebt serviceFuture burdenDebt per residentReserves per residentNet debtAdjustment fundOwn-source revenueTaxes per residentSpending per residentMandatory spendingInvestmentWelfare per residentChild welfareEducation per residentHometown taxStaff per 1,000PopulationPopulation change
| # | Municipality | Prefecture | Population | Current balance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | Nanmoku Village | Gunma | 1,427 | 82.3% | |
| 52 | Nakagawa Village | Nagano | 4,620 | 82.3% | |
| 53 | Niijima Village | Tokyo | 2,415 | 82.4% | |
| 54 | Otaki Village | Nagano | 640 | 82.4% | |
| 55 | Kijimadaira Village | Nagano | 4,237 | 82.4% | |
| 56 | Higashiyoshino Village | Nara | 1,498 | 82.6% | |
| 57 | Achi Village | Nagano | 5,941 | 83.0% | |
| 58 | Urugi Village | Nagano | 472 | 83.0% | |
| 59 | Soni Village | Nara | 1,270 | 83.3% | |
| 60 | Shingo Village | Aomori | 2,059 | 83.5% | |
| 61 | Aogashima Village | Tokyo | 160 | 83.6% | |
| 62 | Ogata Village | Akita | 2,945 | 83.7% | |
| 63 | Samegawa Village | Fukushima | 2,846 | 83.7% | |
| 64 | Ubuyama Village | Kumamoto | 1,361 | 83.7% | |
| 65 | Kamoenai Village | Hokkaido | 740 | 84.2% | |
| 66 | Higashinaruse Village | Akita | 2,334 | 84.3% | |
| 67 | Hara Village | Nagano | 8,090 | 84.3% | |
| 68 | Showa Village | Gunma | 6,938 | 84.5% | |
| 69 | Takayama Village | Nagano | 6,413 | 84.6% | |
| 70 | Tsurui Village | Hokkaido | 2,432 | 84.7% | |
| 71 | Nosegawa Village | Nara | 322 | 84.7% | |
| 72 | Izumizaki Village | Fukushima | 6,092 | 84.8% | |
| 73 | Doshi Village | Yamanashi | 1,509 | 84.8% | |
| 74 | Chihayaakasaka Village | Osaka | 4,687 | 84.8% | |
| 75 | Sagara Village | Kumamoto | 3,961 | 85.0% | |
| 76 | Nishimera Village | Miyazaki | 991 | 85.2% | |
| 77 | Nishimeya Village | Aomori | 1,210 | 85.3% | |
| 78 | Minamidaito Village | Okinawa | 1,227 | 85.4% | |
| 79 | Sanagochi Village | Tokushima | 2,106 | 85.6% | |
| 80 | Ginoza Village | Okinawa | 6,500 | 85.6% | |
| 81 | Sai Village | Aomori | 1,628 | 85.8% | |
| 82 | Kitanakagusuku Village | Okinawa | 17,951 | 85.8% | |
| 83 | Okura Village | Yamagata | 2,760 | 85.9% | |
| 84 | Higashichichibu Village | Saitama | 2,406 | 85.9% | |
| 85 | Mizukami Village | Kumamoto | 1,933 | 85.9% | |
| 86 | Yomitan Village | Okinawa | 42,289 | 85.9% | |
| 87 | Inakadate Village | Aomori | 7,239 | 86.1% | |
| 88 | Sekikawa Village | Niigata | 4,691 | 86.2% | |
| 89 | Aka Village | Fukuoka | 2,843 | 86.2% | |
| 90 | Yomogita Village | Aomori | 2,434 | 86.4% | |
| 91 | Toshima Village | Tokyo | 300 | 86.4% | |
| 92 | Shimokitayama Village | Nara | 796 | 86.4% | |
| 93 | Otari Village | Nagano | 2,811 | 86.6% | |
| 94 | Sakegawa Village | Yamagata | 3,659 | 86.7% | |
| 95 | Katashina Village | Gunma | 3,928 | 86.8% | |
| 96 | Nakagusuku Village | Okinawa | 22,683 | 86.8% | |
| 97 | Katsurao Village | Fukushima | 1,216 | 87.0% | |
| 98 | Zamami Village | Okinawa | 873 | 87.1% | |
| 99 | Makkari Village | Hokkaido | 1,938 | 87.2% | |
| 100 | Nakajima Village | Fukushima | 4,732 | 87.2% |
Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications settlement data. Municipalities without a value (such as the fiscal strength index of Tokyo's special wards) are excluded.